Throwing stuff away is
obviously bad for the environment but many people have come to
expect to throw their faulty item away and buy it again after as
little as a year or so of use.
Sometimes reasons given for this attitude are
as follows..
“They
are cheap, I can afford it”
“It’s
almost cheaper to replace it than to repair
it”
“The
new ones are better with more
features”
“A
new one is more reliable than a repaired
one”
Also for the smaller cheaper items
people believe it would be hard to find someone to repair it or that
it isn’t made to be repaired.
While
some of these reasons are true, they are made true by the
manufacturers either monopolizing the repair of their
products or eliminating the practicality of repair
altogether. This is what I call strategically
un-repairable and is a strategy that is
widespread in a great many manufactured products not just
electronics.
For
example:
I was fixing a Sony TV
recently and one of the parts required cost over $200. The initial price of the TV
back in 2002 was about $1500 but it would worth around $350 today.
The part was a programmable controller integrated circuit that can
be bought for about $5 but then needs a program written on it by
Sony. A process which takes 4 minutes. So it should cost (including
a handsome profit!) about $30.
Needless to say repairing it was not viable
and a otherwise lovely 32” CRT TV ends up in landfill, all because
of a little part 10mm square.
So
here they have eliminated the reason for repair which is to save
yourself money and in my mind at least to also reduce waste.
But here manufacturers have also
monopolized the repair of their product by making it extra expensive
for anyone else to do it. They can charge an unreasonable price for
parts and circuit diagrams.
Some refuse to supply circuit diagrams or repair manuals at
all saying that to do so increases the chances of their product
being copied. Strange then that wasn’t a concern in the days when
circuit diagrams where printed on the inside of the product. A time
also when all electrical products had a Five-year
warranty!
Manufacturers would obviously like you
to re-buy goods that traditionally would last well over five years.
To achieve this not only have they been making it expensive to
repair but have reduced the price and in many cases durability of
the items.
Another example:
A cheap dvd player from an typical
electronic retailer cost $50 and many think that’s great but what
about the drawbacks.
Well for a start it’s not really
designed to last much longer than a couple of years, is usually
guaranteed for only one, is uneconomical to repair because of
manufacturer’s strategy outlined above so millions will end up in
landfill leaching chemicals into the earth and wasting the energy
and materials to took to make it.
While you may think that these cheap,
low-reliability and strategically un-repairable items will be
recycled this is frequently not the case. Recycling companies are
presently allowed to ship hazardous e-waste to poorer countries
where environmental protection laws are weak or non-existent. Have a
read of the RONZ website at www.ronz.org.nz and in particular their link to National Geographic’s
article called Hi-tech trash.
Those of us that are younger than 35 may not
of noticed the implementation of this strategy to make things less
durable and un-repairable. You might think your expectations
of the durability and repair viability of
products is reasonable but right up to the mid 80's
toasters, portable radios and tape players, kettles etc. were
repaired economically with all parts available. From the mid 80’s
onward something happened which I call extreme capitalism but others
call the widespread implementation of planned obsolescence.
To
get a good understanding of what Planned Obsolescence is and it’s
many variants have a read of Wikipedia’s page on it here. Link to:
Wikipedia – Planned
Obsolescence.
Generally it talks about the many strategies companies use to
manipulate your purchasing decisions. Changing the style, colour and
improving the features slightly each year is another strategy
designed to give you the impression that you have the old, ordinary
and inferior product therefore implying you are old, ordinary and
inferior. It sounds extraordinary to me but it does apparently work
on many people, which is why companies are prepared to spend
millions for psychologist to analylse your habits and insecurities
for marketing purposes.
Over producing deliberately short-lived
products is only one way we are damaging our planet. I have chosen
to write about it because few other environmentally concerned people
do. Most concentrate on waste management and recycling, which is
good, but I am more concerned with the fundamental source of
problems. And yes fundamentally it’s
greed.
In my next installment I may
write about waste and it’s enormous effect on our environment. Till
then search the web for “floating rubbish in the pacific”. It’s
twice the size of Texas and will give you an idea of how sad the
human race has become.
When I was just about twelve years old I looked around me in
a bus that was in a traffic jam and I thought of all the towns and
cities in the world and their traffic jams, their power stations,
factories, pollution and waste and I knew then, like I know
now without the aid of any climate scientist that some form of
global catastrophe was inevitable as a result. But of
course it’s not inevitable if we change what’s causing it, but we
will have to change soon.
I'll leave you to think of the neccessary changes, I can
think of hundreds!
Thanks
for reading.